[XML4LIB] Re: Other XML projects

H.M. Gladney hgladney at pacbell.net
Tue Mar 19 12:11:47 EST 2002

Thanks again.

Two last comments on this topic.

My word "taught" implies ideas rather than implementations.

I'll be serving on the EU/NSF WG with Reagan Moore, and will try to find a
non-confrontational way of asking the question.  ("non-confrontational" is
the difficulty.)


-----Original Message-----
From: xml4lib at sunsite.berkeley.edu
[mailto:xml4lib at sunsite.berkeley.edu]On Behalf Of Andrew Ashton
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:47 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [XML4LIB] Re: Other XML projects

on 3/19/02 9:35 AM, H.M. Gladney at hgladney at pacbell.net wrote:

> Ref: "I hope this helps."
> Thank you for trying.  Howewer, your response (attached) doesn't really
> help, because it focuses on stating the challenge (which "everyone"
> whereas my question was directed at what the SDSC project taught that was
> new about solutions (i.e., "what was the answer", not "what was the
> question").

Sorry it wasn't more useful.  The implementation of a comprehensive set of
software tools for collection-level archival management is an attempt at a
solution.  As for novelty, I don't know of any commercial software packages
that address precisely the same issues.

Otherwise, I'll let the SDSC publications speak for themselves since I am
not affiliated with their project.   Good luck.


More information about the xml4lib mailing list